Green finance provides an effective tool for sustainable development. As the center of capital allocation, the credit behavior of commercial banks directly determines the effectiveness of the green implementation policy. Based on the institutional environment of China, this study chooses three types of banks as the research samples: large state-owned banks, joint-stock commercial banks, and city commercial banks. Focusing on the micro perspective, this paper analyzes the adjustments in credit strategies, divergences in implementation practices, and existing barriers among these three categories of banks under the construction of green finance policies. It finds that these three categories generally take a shift in credit structure, retreating from "two-high" industries and enhancing green support as a tendency. Large state-owned banks, taking advantage of scale, stand out in total green credit volume. The joint-stock banks have developed a head start in green loan ratios and product innovativeness with international standards; city commercial banks suffer from small absolute scale and low system infrastructure, so they follow a "weak foundation, catch-up development" pattern. At the same time, all these categories encounter common difficulties in developing green finance. Internationally, there exist widespread issues of risk-return imbalance, a shortage of interdisciplinary professionals, and insufficient data system support. Externally, imperfect policy incentives, lack of uniformity in green standards, and immaturity in the development of the carbon trading market lead to long-lasting bottlenecks. This research provides references for policymakers in increasing the differentiated institutional design and for various banks to improve the green credit operations.
Research Article
Open Access