Research on the Differential Impact of Information Disclosure Quality on Corporate Performance—Analysis Based on Three Dimensions of Environment, Society and Governance

Kexin Cai

doi:10.54254/2754-1169/2025.BL31096

Article Information

Received: 31 December 2025

Published: 5 January 2026

DOI: https://doi.org/10.54254/2754-1169/2025.BL31096

Article Type: Research Article

Cite this article

Cai,K. (2026). Research on the Differential Impact of Information Disclosure Quality on Corporate Performance—Analysis Based on Three Dimensions of Environment, Society and Governance. Advances in Economics, Management and Political Sciences,256,68-77.

Data availability

The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study will be available from the authors upon reasonable request.

Disclaimer/Publisher's Note

The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of EWA Publishing and/or the editor(s). EWA Publishing and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

About this Volume

Volume Title: AEMPS Vol.256

Part of Series: Advances in Economics, Management and Political Sciences

ISSN: 2754-1169 (Print) / 2754-1177 (Online)

Copyright & License

[1]UNWCED. Our common future [M]. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1987.

[2]Global Compact. (2004). Who Cares Wins: Connecting Financial Markets to a Changing World.

[3]Freeman, R. E. (1984). Strategic management: A stakeholder approach. Boston: Pitman.

[4]Spence, M. (1973). Job market signaling. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 87(3), 355–374.

[5]Xiao Hua, Zhang Guoqing. The governance effect of mandatory information disclosure—based on the empirical evidence of listed companies in heavy pollution industries in our country [ J ] . Economic Research, 2018, 53(10) : 158-174.

[6]Sheng Hongtao, Huang Nan, Liu Lang. Carbon emissions trading system and Corporate Green Innovation: an empirical study based on the triple difference model [ J ] . Financial Research, 2020(12) : 132-151.

[7]Li Shu, Xie Xiaoyan. Corporate Social Responsibility Information Disclosure and corporate capital cost—empirical evidence from China s capital market [ J ] . Nankai management review, 2014, 17(05) : 106-115.

[8]Greggio, N., Jalal, R. N., & Sclip, A. (2022). The (non-)market reaction to ESG events: A systematic literature review. Journal of Cleaner Production, 367, 133064.

[9]Li Wenfei, Li Jianxin. Review and prospect of the impact of ESG performance on enterprise value [ J ] . Accounting Monthly, 2022(15) : 112-119.

[10]Yang Yi, Li Yu Xiaolu, Hong Xiangjun. Environmental Information Disclosure, media supervision and corporate value [ J ] . Accounting Research, 2019(08) : 88-95.

[11]Clarkson, P. M., Li, Y., Richardson, G. D., & Vasvari, F. P. (2008). Revisiting the relation between environmental performance and environmental disclosure: An empirical analysis. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 33(4-5), 303–327.

[12]Zhang Changjiang, Chen Yuqing, Zhang Yue. Green technology innovation, environmental information disclosure and corporate value [ J ] . Research in science and technology management, 2021, 41(18) : 211-220.

[13]Yang Hanming, Wu Danhong. Corporate Social Responsibility Information Disclosure and employee loyalty: Empirical evidence from Chinese listed companies [ J ] . Macroeconomic Research, 2015(08) : 120-129 + 160.

[14]Barnett, M. L., & Salomon, R. M. (2012). Does it pay to be really good? Addressing the shape of the relationship between social and financial performance. Strategic Management Journal, 33(11), 1304–1320.

[15]Quan Xiaofeng, Yin Hongying. Executive pay gap, internal control and corporate social responsibility [ J ] . Economic Management, 2017, 39(08) : 156-174.)

[16]Eccles, R. G., Ioannou, I., & Serafeim, G. (2014). The impact of corporate sustainability on organizational processes and performance. Management Science, 60(11), 2835–2857.